Prafulla Kumar Mohanty
In glibtongued nonchalance almost
every human, except a few (very), say life is such a difficult challenge, so
hard, so nasty, brutish and short. Poets
in all languages and cultures sing of life as futile time serving in a hell hole where
even to breathe is a Herculean effort. The eighteen year old Chatterton, wrote a
few insipid poems and killed himself saying: The world is too much for us.
Despite the warranty of death, the inevitable end of life, people commit
suicide. The Romans and the Japanese are famously suicidal. But Macbeth refused
self-slaughter (why should I play the Roman fool ? As long as I see heads before me gashes would do better on them.) Some
worthies who respect the cannons of the everlasting against self slaughter desist the impulse. All these and many other
vocables which I don't wish to record for
want of space lead me to the question,
is life such a debatable proposition
! Man is born one day dies another day. Sunrise and sunset is a multi
splendored procession of light , glory
rain, clouds, crimson to golden orange colour spectrum between dawn and
dusk: The sun never stops, never falls on the ocean in disgust of repetitive
boredom! Why then some men (women too)
cut untimely the journey with
morbid scissors? Is suicide so very attractive to engage human passion to fatal termination?
All sages, thinkers and wise men
during the course of the relentless journey of the Homo (erectus) Sapiens have
said life is God's greatest gift to man. A scientist, denying Darwin like,
divine origin to life will at least credit it to nature. Man is a natural phenomenon with an
unrechargeable life force. Life on earth is psychosocial energy which achieves things by physical and mental work.
At least man tries to survive the process by trying to wriggle out of his
hunger, sickness, frustration, failures and other antipathies of nature -
society by his native intelligence and physical energy. Why should he be afraid
of the built in fears and
impediments natural or
self-caused and think of an escape route half way? When he succeeds he never
pauses; he becomes a king, a godly
person, a warrior, an inventor, a scientist, innovator, writer,
administrator, a saviour of life and also a fighter, a killer, a master
political strategist and what not!! When he fails to climb the throne in the
legitimate manner he invents devious ways, murderous short cuts and other strategies which he himself would hate - only
to succeed. Why should then failures,
defeat, disappointment, setbacks, penury or loss of honour and frustration lead
him to the bare bodkin? He sees the most
beautiful roses rotting in a state of half bloom in a snow storm. Wanton
children ruin many a butterfly
their humming courtship; lightning
strikes many towers to ignominious fall; many Ramas are exiled on coronation
moments, Nelson Mandellas waste their manhood in dark cells: Do they all kill
themselves? Does Sita jump into the nearest river after Laxman left her in the trackless forest? She fought
against all odds with remarkable
dignity. She was defamed as a queen but
she retained her feminine grace by silent non submission to calamity. She
respected life and finally returned to her mother earth. All hungry men do not
beg, they struggle for their bread.
Shall we then tentatively
conclude that those who make peace with knife or poison are afraid of life? A
moral coward strikes his head against temple walls; a shrunken soul writes
homilies, "He who patiently wants
burden bears... is a king". Yes silent and unprotesting suffering
is advocated by many so called poets who
depended on borrowed sustenance . But those who rushed out to meet headlong the
bullets and bombs to save others are greater kings. Man has to choose
between worthless suffering and heroic
death. But this death is not self
slaughter. If one makes a sacrifice to
save people, to make others feel reassured, is a higher soul. But one who
withdraws from the performance stage of life into the dark wings is a sub man,
less than human.
The suicide of Sushant Singh
Rajput for me was a cowardly act. I have watched his career right from his
Pavitra Rishta days. An actor, dancer and a good man, naturally ambitious. He got a break in Bollywood, gained some
reputation and also success. But he accepted his victimhood and put the rope
around his neck in his lonely bedroom. What a shame! What a waste of human
vitality! What an insult to his share of the life force! If people around you
try to throttle your talents it means you are talented and a threat to the
starkids who monopolize the industry. And you yourself surrendered your talent to
your victimhood. Amitabh Bachchan after his ABCL was gone but even with repeated failures
at the Box office did not feel defeated,
did not surrender to the victimizers, did not beg for mercy from any powers
- human or divine. He fought on with calm determination for he had immense and unshakable faith in
his talents. And look where he is today!
The greatness of man lies in
steering the course of his life. He discriminates between the raw and the cooked between
dignity and ignominy. He fights not for survival alone, he fights to place
himself on the pedestal of glory. What people say 'mental health', in my view
is irrelevant unless it is a disease.
But those who take anti depressants and run to the head shrinkers are
depersonalised by their own incomprehension of life and the human reality. Man must know his own strength and weakness
and choose his course. If he cannot climb to the top let him build a road
around and walk. But if he cannot walk that is his funeral. Man chooses his
destiny. He fights fate with his free will. If his life cannot accept his new
failures, he is not human. All mental problems are egocentric. if the ego fails
to perceive the challenges it is weak. And this weakness is to be overcome by
more persuasive determination to win to conquer
and to strive to the epitonic limit of the nerves. If you can't nurse
and nourish your nerves better not to be born.