Prafulla Kumar Mohanty
Homo Sapien
: Male,Female, Transgender:
Hungry man, Sick man, Old man, Fighter,
Renouncer, King, Hero:
Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Budhist, Zorastrian,
Jew:
English,
French, Hindi, Urdu, Portugese...:
Czarist,
Zionist, Lord, Fuehrer, Chakraborty, Socialist, Communist, Fabian Socialist,
Democrat, Republican:
Married ,
Bachelor, Widow, Husband, Wife, Lover:
White, Red,
Black, Brown:
Second sex,
Third sex, American, Italian, Indian:
Libran, Leo..:
Slave , Master:
Ruling
class, Opposition...etc etc etc...
Man has been all these
over the centuries. But what is man?
What is his identity ? In a world historically updating itself and making civilizational
adjustments in decades and centuries nomenclatures have stamped men and events
in different languages. Birth and death records are maintained in registers-
now digitally all over the world. Naming an object perhaps started by the
Christian God in the Bible. After creating things and creatures He started
naming them. And this system continues officially in all countries irrespective
of faiths and administrative structures. But there is the Rub!
Man takes on different identities despite his/her name which
identified him/her at the Christening ceremony. For instance T.S. Eliot gave
three identities of his in a lecture to Oxonians post his Nobel Award: I am an
Anglo-Catholic in Religion: a Royalist in politics and a classicist in Literature. Tendulkar once
said 'I am an Indian First, a Maharastrian second and then a cricketer'. Any
normal person has almost several identities. He may identify himself by his nationality; his profession,
religion, caste, sex, marital status. He has several IDs like Adhar Card, Pan
Card, Voter Identification Card, Club membership etc. His name is no more an
identity. He has a class identity too! Arnold J Toynby wrote in 1947 " I
am a middle aged English man belonging to the middle class". Politically
people identify themselves by their Party loyalties. Others say - I am Punjabi
, Gujrati , Odia etc. Yet others say they are Scientists, Litterateurs,
Economists etc.
In the present day world the religious identity seems to be
overpowering. Asaduddin Owaisy is a Muslim and he must oppose anything that is
Hindu. In the sports arena too the religious identity supersedes the nationality. An India - Pakistan match becomes a Hindu -
Muslim war although in the Indian team we often have more than one Muslim
player. In Indian politics whatever decision the Prime Minister takes for the
good of the country becomes a Hindutwa Agenda. And it must be opposed by
the Congress, the Left and also the
Muslim sympathisers. The interest of the country is secondary. What is focused
in all debates discussions is religious identity politics. Any issue is made
religion specific and leads to conflictual claims on political, moral or
national validity. This disturbing trend raises many questions about identity.
Does man have a human identity as an individual or the
secondary and inherited identity is supreme? Does the individual have a mind of
his own unclattered by the mass identity. Man perseveres to
achieve distinction in his chosen field- art, literature , science or sports
etc- but he is known to the world by his mass, group or inherited identities. Can a man say like
Michael Jackson be identified as a singer dancer without tags of his country,
religion and other self chosen beliefs? Can Romeo be identified as a Christian Lover? Is not love the greatest
value in life? But can that value be the flag of your identity? Can a Kashmiri
be identified as an Indian without reference to his religion? Unfortunately No.
Human identity does not stem from the human essence a man exudes in his work.
Beethoven or Wagner, Tansen or
Thyagaraja are above the local hues which they gather during
the course of their lives. But today identity has shades of meaning and appeal
beyond the self and soul of a being.
In the 1970's most literature departments researched on
Crisis of Identity. It was thought, after the Wars and the political changes in
the world Man has lost his identity. What was that? It was the crisis of the
authentic human being. But that crisis was never resolved. In today's world if
you say "I am a lover" people will laugh because love is no more an
identifying attribute of a human being.
In a materialistic world what matters is 'success'. Any professional or
politician who succeeds in amassing money
or wielding power has its identity in the minds of his admirers or detractors. No
identity is now a monolithic whole.
Identity of the basic human being is no more
relevant. Your identity is measured by money, influence or power. The passport
is often a pidgin identity. But in the ultimate analysis you are what you feel
yourself to be as I am what I am.