If you abuse power, you are
powerful. A person who obeys rules, respects constitutional provisions and acts
accordingly has no power. Only when you defy, disregard and disobey, you emerge
as an alternative center of power. Had Indira Gandhi obeyed the Allahabad High Court order disqualifying her election, she would have been an ordinary mortal. But
she, defied, punished the judicial authority by political power and emerged as
a very powerful person. She perhaps, illustrated Lord Acton’s statement that power
corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, but to my mind power is
basically a defiant energy which does not accept a superior authority under
which we bow down our heads. If god is the most potent authority or the limit
of all imaginable things it is tempting to challenge him. Lucifer or Satan
therefore is equally feared as God because the power to harm is more in Satan.
But in all religions we are
taught, the most powerful is the most benign, generous, kind and loving. That
powerful being is God. This power which we call divine is a moral power. The
moral power decimates the ruthless physical power and creates an order of
peace, tranquillity and even joy. But this order is always an unreachable goal
perpetually chased yet never reached. Heaven and god are imaginaries of
possibilities. Any person who displays qualities of a superior moral force is seen as god by us. The Buddha, Christ and Gandhi gave us concrete blueprints of
a divine order, reachable and practicable. But Christ and Gandhi were killed by
the alternative energies demonstrating that political- physical power is
tangibly more powerful. The kings wielded political and (physical) military
power as the chosen agents of god to rule over the earth,i.e, their area of
command. Rama, perhaps, is the greatest symbol of moral power in poetic
imagination. In history we read of Ashoka, Bikramaditya and Akbar as kings who
wielded moral authority. But one may ask with a straight face without being
cynical, how many have they killed with their “moral power?”. If you have to
kill to enforce morality, the other kings or so called leaders can also justify mass killing in the name of ideology. Stalin, Mao Tse Deng - if not Hitler and other dictators-can also justify the power of ideology, killing the opposition to establish their sense of order.
Can we therefore ever accept power as an order force? No, power negates the
virtues of compassion, love and charity which are basic human values expected
in the person enjoying a position of power.
Power is a divisive force. It divides people
into two groups- the ruler and the ruled, the master and the slave, the wisest
and the most foolish. In modern democracies, be they the Presidential or the
Parliamentary forms, the moment we utter the word ‘power’ the country is
divided into two groups: the power group or the ruling class or the Treasury
bench and the opposition. The ruling group is also not a homogeneous unit. Internal
conflicts, aspirational rivalries, competitions to be number one goes on in the
ruling group and also in the opposition. The man at the top is always tense to
retain his power for there is space for only one man at the top. Power also
compels a further division between the person wielding power and his
conscience. Power at times prompts the authority to sign an order or resolution
against his own better judgement. Thus power creates a threefold division. It
can never unite. The so called unity comes under threat of power, out of fear
not love.
Prafulla Kumar Mohanty