Prafulla Kumar Mohanty
Honour is an honorific word
signifying a person’s or country’s achievement that elevates the stature of an
individual or country, commanding respect of people in general. Honour is a
fulfilment of the human spirit. The average individual is most often a
reflexive pragmatist unless he is a dud waiting for things to happen to him. He
searches for the needs of the self and is satisfied without assertive
survival. But a man who believes in his
inner spirit aspires for glory, heroism, creativity. He makes life more than a
package of living. He may be an Arjuna or an Achilles or even a Ravan with an
urging soul to dominate, conquer and confidently earn respect of the common man.
He always leads and never is led compromising his self-esteem. The soul may
also enter a reflective state of being where ideas, metaphors, rhythms can
invent truths not perceived by the laity. He may also renounce, sacrifice his
energies to serve people with compassion. Compassion too is a great soul value.
These souls earn and achieve a state of honour which is not palpable. It is an
abstract social value which endows the soul with pride, a sense of non-arrogant
superiority not displayed or proclaimed but a state of worthiness much more
valuable than money, power or visible assets. Honour is a social perception of
a name, a reputation.
Some people achieve honour by
their soul force striving for it by pursuing qualities of excellence; some
inherit it vicariously by their birth into a family. For example, the children
of celebrated families of King’s or other respectable institutions. Some others
have greatness thrust on them, again vicariously by chance or circumstantial
gimmicks. But honour is a state of divinity which a mortal attains by his deeds
- courage, compassion or sacrifice.
Those rich and powerful men who think they are honourable are self elevated
morons. Shakespeare’s Falstaff (Henry IV part 1) says:
What is honour? A word. What
is that word honour? What is that honour? Air!
A trim reckoning! Who hath
it? He that died a’ Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No.
Doth he hear it? No. ‘Tis
insensible then? Yea, to the dead.... honour is a mere
scutcheon...
Since it is dangerous to disagree
with Shakespeare who is definitely more endurably honourable than most men of
honour, I accept with humility. But Falstaff is definitely not my embodiment of
honour, for he does not make people proud of him. Honour is that value which
makes people feel elevated by the achievements of an individual. A man who
lives for others and/ or gives a sense of relief, solace, pride, safety, joy
and such like values to a large section of people deserves the honorific of
honourable man.
When a person is self assertive, however exalted
his heroic honour may be we hesitate to accept such heroes. Victories over
human hearts are more honourable than the heroic exploits of war heroes.
Achilles and Shakespeare’s Macbeth are not men of honour. A man of honour is always
humble, for his honour stems from people’s acceptance of his greatness. Honour
does not exist in a socio- cultural vacuum. Honour is always bestowed by
society: it cannot be claimed like an average man claiming credit for killing a
snake. But can you kill or commit suicide in the name of honour? Often men of glory
kill themselves when their unconscious follies come to light. Othello,
definitely a man of heroic honour, falls victim to his baser self manifested in
jealousy. When he realizes his blunder, he kills himself. Antony too kills
himself but his stature does not lift up by suicide. Cleopatra dramatizes her
own reckoning, thereby enhancing her innate honour. But when parents kill their
sons or daughters for love affairs or inter- religious marriages, in the name
of honour, doubts crop in the mind about honour.
Is honour a caste or religious
value? If a son or daughter marries a person of another caste or faith, how is
one’s honour tarnished? The Khap Panchayats in India pronounce death penalty on
love defectors without hesitation and parents obey in the name of honour. Raped
women often kill themselves as ditched women do, for honour. But honour is not
associated with chastity which is important in itself. Violation of a woman definitely
injures female pride but I do not think honour is violated. Sita dies for
honour which she had earned, after she was abandoned by Ram, by her determined
existence of purity. But that is not true of Amba or the rape victims. When the
politicians demand respect for their honour and prestige we feel like laughing
for except a few politicians whose souls glow with sage like flame for mankind,
the others are rooted in self. One attains honour after a lifetime of work
dedicated to human welfare or mass enlightenment. Let us not, therefore,
cheapen it by using it in the manner in which we use the word beautiful.
No comments:
Post a Comment