Prafulla Kumar Mohanty
Given a choice between peace and
success, the hand of any sane man will rise in favour of success. Man would
like to win, conquer, advance in life, get rich and richer, be powerful, gain
accolades and wear the star studded crown. The self of a person must satisfy
his ambitions, aspirations, wishes and realize all his dreams. Everyman is
Utopian in his chosen or available field of operation. May be God has no wishes
unfulfilled and therefore he can only grant and give. In any case the human believers
have kept God in that absolutist position. The self of man chases that Absolute
in his field of action. A clerk dreams of being the boss, a poet wishes to be
greater than Shakespeare, a beggar desires to be Bill Gates and so on. There is
nothing wrong with desires or dreams. And the world has so many rags to riches
stories that doubts are at a premium. If a two bit corporal who loses his eyes
in the First War could become the Fuhrer Adolf Hitler and a Chaibala could be
Prime Minister Modi Why can't an ant ride the Pegasus? No quarrels. Man on
earth has come to become somebody for the earth is a theatre of manifestations.
Man must leave his print on the earth. He strives, perseveres, studies,
researches, trains, thinks with single minded devotion. Arjun practised hitting
targets in the dark nights. Great speakers practise before mirrors (so even do
demagogues), singers practise all lifelong and soldiers train as do cricketers
and footballers at all odd times. But the question is why don't they all
succeed in equal measures?
All students of a great teacher
do not succeed equally in their respective persuasions in life. Those who failed blame that unseen power- fate- and resign to themselves. Some of them take
failure as a challenge and work hard with redoubled vigour. Yet success does
not uniformly crown them. The saints and knowalls may say, something was amiss
in their perseverance. What? Perhaps we do not know yet. Success however is not
a guaranteed noun. But when we see a rapist, a murderer presiding over our
destiny sitting in a chair of power, we
do wonder: how could this happen? How could a builder, a political novice
become Donald Trump, the most powerful man in the 2020 world? How could
Dhirubhai Ambani create his business empire rising up and up from
very humble beginnings? Well, here is the trick of fate which defies
logic. All seeds of the same species do not grow up to massive trees. Is
something skewed with our logic of morality?
We have all been taught by
teachers and great men that honesty, hard
work and devoted pursuit of your goal someday or other will give you the
taste of success. Does it mean that
those failed lacked in honesty of purpose and pursuit? Can we say that all rich
corporates are honest ? All those who are successful in their fields are not
men of infallible integrity. Many people like Bijoy Mallya and Nirav Modi cheat
and pull fast ones to get rich and 'successful'. Shall we call these people
successful and Leo Tolstoi a 'failure' for he was not awarded the Nobel Prize?
My honest readers will judge.
In the same vein when I think of
the lauded man who have carved their image on the hearts of people like Mahatma
Gandhi, Lincoln and Churchill are truly
successful? Freedom at the cost of division of India definitely caused great pain to Gandhi. And what has
happened to successful Gandhi's India in his afterlife we know and experience.
Philosophically there is nothing called success; it is at best valid for a
period in history. Later Years make that success foggy by many analyses which
are mind boggling. Moreover success is not unidirectional. A man like T.S .
Eliot had no family life, no social life. Gandhi, Buddha and all those great
men who had spectacular contributions towards mankind had to sacrifice many a
comfort of daily life.
For this reason people categorize
success as material, social and spiritual. Material and social success can be
measured although the yardstick may have different dimensions at different
times in history. We remember Alexander, Napoleon for their military success. If we do we must also
remember their personal agony, of lovelessness and later ignominy. But can we
say Timur and Gajani were also very successful as marauders and looters? Or the
East India Company for that matter? No, for the values associated with their
success are not prohuman. If humanity is pained or ashamed by one's success it
is not worth a boot. If that is not true a man who succeeds in killing a common enemy is also a great
hero. The action of man or the fruits of action enjoyed by a
man are not the measure of one's success. On one level success is the pursued
goal reached after a struggle of a lifetime: this success satisfies a self. On
the other a man's work saves life and improves the quality of life for all time. No man can claim to have
achieved the success of the later kind. But success after a soulful effort is
pleasing to the human being. If it is the realization of his personal ambition
it is the fulfillment of his being. But if a man works for mankind's general
peace and salvation he is the Son of God. But normal mortals measure success by
their bank balance or power to do good things for others. At least
this much success makes a life full and glorious.