Prafulla Kumar Mohanty
Almost fifty percent of India’s population comprises the farming
community. We often take pride in speaking from public platforms that India
lives in the villages and the farmers are our Annadata. During the seventy years of India’s Independent self-rule right
from the first Primeminister Nehru to the present P.M. Modi the same
superlative sobriquet is used for the farmers-Annadata. But the giver of the food
is never happy. He is half -starved, loanladen and self-destructive. Sounds ironical, doesn’t it?
Indian agriculture has been mostly rainfed. Appeasement of
the rain gods, even after sending a Mars craft successfully in the first
attempt, continues till date in several parts of the country. Joining the major
rivers of the country for continuous availability of water for irrigation
purposes has not yet started. The irrigation projects in most states are
inadequate. Farmers take loans from moneylenders and banks to finance their efforts,
which is natural, but often they fail to pay back the amount taken for crop failure.
The vagaries of monsoon, pests, unseasonal rains, hailstorms and other natural
- unnatural menaces play truant with the fate of the farmers rendering him
helpless and miserable. If the rainfall is good and farmers launch dream ships
in the air, another danger chokes their hopes-the anomaly of plenty. The simple
law of demand and supply makes the product cheap and prices fall dashing all
their hopes. Scenes of potato, tomato and other vegetables, wheat etc thrown on
highways or into rivers are not rare in bumper crop years. Politicians
especially in the opposition parties go hoarse in the Parliament shouting for
the right MSP for farmer’s products and a few sops are declared. The MSP is
raised by a small amount and government becomes the chief buyer. But there is
no improvement in their lot.
This story is repeated year after year. Modernization of
agriculture is not uniformly done. The farmer though is more aware today
because of technology and scientific knowledge -soil testing, fertilizer
quality, monsoon forecast- his investments never become gainful. Unable to
repay the loans he puts an end to his own life. Farmer suicide is a blight on the people, society and government. The Annadata feeds others but his own
family is unfed. His children never go to good schools; they prefer to be tea
sellers, peons in offices or drivers than farmers following the parental
footsteps.
When the farmers commit suicide governments at the centre
and state pay a sort of compensation ranging from 3 to 5 lakhs. At times
popular governments write off the bank loans thereby jeopardizing the economy.
Protest marches are taken out in multiple cities, slogans against the state and
central governments are loud- speakered much to the annoyance of everybody. But
no permanent solutions are found by any government. When the British ruled
India there was no industrial growth as there was no agricultural prosperity.
Gurucharan Das writes, “The industrial revolution did not occur because the
Indian agriculture remained stagnant, and you cannot have an industrial
revolution without an agricultural surplus…”
No point blaming the British. In independent India the
agricultural growth is hovering around 3%only.To relieve the stress of the
farmers Swaminathan, a great agricultural scientist, has suggested that the
farmers be given 50% profit over their total investment. No government has done
it. Narendra Modi in his election speeches promised the farmers to adopt
Swaminathan Commission report, but going into the last year of Modi’s rule this
assurance too has fallen flat.
A radical solution could be to release agriculture from protectionism
of all kinds. Let them beg, borrow and invest money and repay on their own. Let
there be no compassionate compensation for suicides. But let the farming
community be free to sell their products in the open market on their own terms.
Agriculture may be treated as an industry like the film industry. Let them be
taxed on their incomes. Let there be no subsidies of any kind. The farmers however
must create their own leadership in collection and distribution without an eye
on political positions. The market
forces will determine the price of their products and they will function like
other manufacturers of consumer products. The farmers should not become willing
vote banks of any party- left right and centre. Let the farmer live with
dignity and determine his own fate. Any takers?
No comments:
Post a Comment